|
Select the topic that interests
you, or submit
your own question:
-
How are trackers used in
medicine?
- What
is the benefit of using
a magnetic tracker with
an imaging system?
- What
is the difference between
optical and magnetic trackers?
- What
should I look for when choosing
a medical tracker?
- Aren’t
all magnetic trackers about
the same?
- I’ve
heard that magnetic trackers
are hard to use in medical
environments. Is this true?
-
Can Ascension customize
a tracker to my needs?
-
When should I start thinking
about incorporating a tracker
into my medical device?
1)
How are trackers used in medicine?
A. Motion
trackers measure the position
and orientation (X, Y, Z,
Yaw, Pitch, Roll) of one or
more sensors in 3D space.
Measurements are used to track
the real-time motion of medical
instruments and devices for
localization and targeting
purposes. In one prominent
application, an Ascension
pciBIRD™ sensor is attached
to an ultrasound scanhead
for freehand data acquisition
and subsequent viewing of
3D reconstructions of multiple
2D image planes. Ascension
trackers are also used in
minimally invasive procedures
for measuring anatomy, guiding
interventions, and navigating
inside the body.
2)
What’s the benefit of using
a magnetic tracker with an
imaging system?
A. The combination
of miniaturized magnetic sensors
with imaging systems lets
clinicians follow a real-time
graphic display of the current
and projected position of
interventional tools onto
real-time ultrasound or recently
acquired CT images. Using
it, clinicians can quickly
and precisely guide biopsy
needles or ablation tools
to soft-tissue lesions within
the human body. The risk of
hitting delicate, adjacent
anatomy is also minimized.
Magnetically guided intervention
shortens procedures through
pre-visualization of target
trajectory and single needle
insertion. When used with
CT imaging, it reduces radiation
exposure by minimizing the
number of verification CT
scans. In CT procedures, a
spare position/orientation
measurement sensor is placed
on the patient so the true
anatomical position of the
target can be continuously
monitored during procedure.
Ascension's new pciBIRD is
the choice for such imaging
procedures. It offers highly
accurate tracking of multiple
miniaturized sensors without
performance loss due to the
presence of nearby conductive
metals.
3) What’s
the difference between optical
and magnetic trackers?
A. Optical
trackers operate by emitting
a light source that is sensed
by one of more detectors.
While highly accurate, they
are obtrusive and require
a clear line-of sight between
source and detector at all
times. If an occlusion occurs,
measurements are lost. This
precludes use within the body
and limits usefulness in application
in which heads and hands move
freely within a tracking volume.
Magnetic trackers transmit
magnetic fields that permeate
all non-metallic surfaces.
These sensors have been miniaturized
for medical applications and
can be placed inside the body
and even inside some instruments.
Its transmitter possesses
a small form factor and can
be draped to avoid sterilization.
As a result, magnetic trackers
minimize clutter in procedural
fields.
4)
What should I look for when
choosing a medical tracker?
A. First,
seek a company that focuses
on developing medical tracking
products and presents a robust
record of bringing products
to market. Making a tracker
work in medicine requires
clear understanding of technology
tradeoffs, interface issues,
and customization requirements.
It is one thing to make a
tracker work in a vacuum;
it is a far different issue
to make it work successfully
in a medical application.
Second, evaluate competing
trackers before making a decision.
At least one major medical
company has come to regret
not performing due diligence
before making a major investment.
Finally, look for expertise
and versatility in tracking
solutions. With the recent
expiration of first generation
AC magnetic tracking patents,
a number of start-ups have
built AC trackers and rushed
into the medical market. While
their intentions are good,
their track records are poor.
Your safest bet is to deal
with an experienced tracking
company offering multiple
trackers, and configurations
that can be readily modified
to meet your requirements.
5)
Aren’t all magnetic trackers
about the same?
A. No, there
are several generations of
trackers on the market. These
range from 1st generation
AC electromagnetic technology
patented by Polhemus in the
1970s; 2nd generation pulsed
DC magnetic technology patented
by Ascension in the 1990s;
and now 3rd generation magnetic
technology patented by Ascension.
The latter features the latest
improvements and innovations
in magnetic technology. First
generation trackers are notoriously
susceptible to distorted measurements
in the presence of environmental
metals, such as carbon steel,
aluminum, and even stainless
steel. Second generation DC
trackers exhibit only 1/5
the sensitivity to conductive
metal as their earlier counterparts.
As a result their sensors
can be attached to ultrasound
scanheads, titanium instruments
and stainless steel objects
without discernable loss of
accuracy. Third generation
trackers represent the state-of-the
art in tracking. These include
alarms to warn of any accuracy
distortion, special transmitters
that screen distortions emanating
below the tracking volume,
miniaturized transducers for
close-in operation, and advanced
calibration techniques that
yield sub-millimeter accuracies.
6)
Is it true that magnetic trackers
are hard to use in medical
environments?
A. Yes,
they can be, especially if
the technology is first generation
vintage. In the last 10 years
many medical device manufacturers
have evaluated these early
trackers and found them inadequate,
usually because of accuracy
distortion and improper placement.
When developing the 3rd generation
tracking technology the focus
was and is to address the
previous generation’s inadequacies.
One of the major improvements
has been metal compensation
techniques. The improvement
of these techniques continues.
Bottom line: don’t give up
on electromagnetic tracking
due to its previous limitations.
7)
Can Ascension customize a
tracker to my needs?
A. Yes.
Ascension has a long and successful
record of modifying tracker
configurations to meet stringent
medical requirements. In 2001,
Ascension designed and developed
for General Electric Medical
Systems a new BIRD tracker
with a pci bus interface and
custom cabling in under six
months. This tracker, pciBIRD™,
is now available as an option
for their Logiq 9 Ultrasound
system. This year, Ascension
added miniaturized transmitters
and sensors to the pci platform
to meet customer’s requirements.
8)
When should I start thinking
about incorporating a tracker
into my medical device?
A. During
the development stage, if
possible. Integrating a tracker
into an existing medical device
without forethought can be
the recipe for trouble. This
approach can be expensive,
time consuming, and will most
likely not provide optimal
system performance. For instance,
the present configuration
of the medical device may
require the tracker to operate
beyond its specified range,
resulting in degraded performance.
The best approach is to design
the tracker in during the
development stage. The end
result is a robust tracker
specifically designed and
optimized for your medical
application.
|